Notes: starting xv6.

This commit is contained in:
Philippe Pittoli 2025-02-09 07:02:32 +01:00
parent d2beeaa0c9
commit 0f46dc4652

View file

@ -55,3 +55,56 @@ A process is:
- an address space to give a running program the illusion of owning the entire memory
- a thread to give a running program the illusion of having a CPU for himself
starting xv6, the different phases
context: booting up the machine
=> paging hardware disabled (virtual memory == physical memory)
=> booting at phy@ 0x80000000 because 0-0x80000000 contains IO devices
=> FYI: stack grows DOWN
boot loader loads xv6 into memory then jumps to _entry (kernel/entry.S:7)
phases for _entry:
1. sets up a 4096-byte stack for each hardware thread (HART)
(hart = "hardware thread" as opposed to software-managed thread context)
these stacks start at the address "start0" defined in C code (kernel/start.c:11)
2. loads stack0+4096 in sp (stack pointer)
(which is the top of the first stack because stacks grow DOWN)
3. jumps to C function "start" (kernel/start.c:14)
phases for "start":
=> main idea: "start" performs machine-mode configuration then jumps to "main"
ex: interruptions, exceptions and Physical Memory Protection configuration
1. configures supervisor mode (related to the `mret` RISC-V instruction)
mret enables to "return" from a mode to previous one
mret in this case is first _configured_ to jump to supervisor mode
a. mstatus (previous mode) is set to "supervisor"
b. mepc (return address) is set to the address of "main" (kernel/main.c:10)
c. satp (page-table register) is set to 0
=> disables virtual address translation in supervisor mode
d. delegates all interruptions and exceptions to supervisor mode
2. sets a timer interrupts on the clock chip
3. changes to supervisor mode with `mret` while jumping to "main" (kernel/main.c:10)
phases for "main":
1. initializes devices, subsystems and a lot of stuff in general
2. calls "userinit" (kernel/proc.c:233) to set up the first "user process"
=> it is just the creation of the process from a kernel point of view ≠ execution
=> the process is then in "RUNNABLE" state
=> the program for this process is in initcode.S (kernel/initcode.S:3)
(but compiled for some reason into the kernel/proc:221 char array)
3. calls the scheduler
executes the only "RUNNABLE" process in the list, made by "userinit"
=> this "initcode" executes the /init application
here is the code:
1. a0 = address to the "/init" string
2. a1 = argv for the future process
3. EXEC syscall to run the init program with provided parameters (a0 & a1)
phases for /init:
1. creates a console device (if needed)
2. opens file descriptors
3. starts the shell on the newly created console
system is up and running, yay!