DMARC: first baby steps towards an implementation of the type.
This commit is contained in:
parent
41098eed8b
commit
538547d1cc
79
src/App/Type/DMARC.purs
Normal file
79
src/App/Type/DMARC.purs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
|
|||||||
|
module App.Type.DMARC where
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
import Prelude
|
||||||
|
import Data.Generic.Rep (class Generic)
|
||||||
|
import Data.Show.Generic (genericShow)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
import App.Type.GenericSerialization (generic_serialization)
|
||||||
|
import Data.Maybe (Maybe(..))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
import Data.Codec.Argonaut (JsonCodec)
|
||||||
|
import Data.Codec.Argonaut as CA
|
||||||
|
import Data.Codec.Argonaut.Record as CAR
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
type DMARC
|
||||||
|
= {
|
||||||
|
-- | adkim= Optional.
|
||||||
|
-- | Consistency policy for DKIM. Either strict (dkim signature domain = "From:" field) or relaxed.
|
||||||
|
adkim :: Maybe ConsistencyPolicy
|
||||||
|
-- | aspf= Optional.
|
||||||
|
-- | Consistency policy for SPF. Either strict (dkim signature domain = "From:" field) or relaxed.
|
||||||
|
, aspf :: Maybe ConsistencyPolicy
|
||||||
|
-- | v= "DMARC1", entirely optional (for now, even ignored).
|
||||||
|
, v :: Maybe Version
|
||||||
|
-- | pct= Percentage of messages to filter [0...100], 100 by default.
|
||||||
|
, pct :: Int
|
||||||
|
-- | p= Requested Mail Receiver policy (None, Quarantine, Reject).
|
||||||
|
, p :: Policy
|
||||||
|
-- | sp= Requested Mail Receiver policy for all subdomains.
|
||||||
|
, sp :: Policy
|
||||||
|
-- | ruf= Addresses to which message-specific failure information is to be reported.
|
||||||
|
, ruf :: MailTo
|
||||||
|
-- | fo= When to send a report (on DKIM or SPF error? Any? Both?).
|
||||||
|
, fo :: Maybe ReportOccasion
|
||||||
|
-- | rua= Where to send the aggregated reports. A size limit can be provided (see `rua_maxlen`).
|
||||||
|
, rua :: MailTo
|
||||||
|
-- | Optional. !XXm Max size of the report (in megabytes).
|
||||||
|
, rua_maxlen :: Maybe Int
|
||||||
|
-- | rf= Optional. Report format, AFRF by default.
|
||||||
|
, rf :: Maybe Format
|
||||||
|
-- | ri= Optional. Interval requested between aggregate reports. By default 86400.
|
||||||
|
, ri :: Maybe Int
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
data ReportOccasion = Both | DKIMonly | SPFonly | AnyOccasion
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
data ConsistencyPolicy
|
||||||
|
-- | s = strict.
|
||||||
|
-- |
|
||||||
|
-- | For DKIM: DKIM signature and "From:" field should have the exact same domain.
|
||||||
|
-- |
|
||||||
|
-- | For SPF: First, SPF should produce a passing result. Then, the "From:" and the "MailFrom:" fields are checked.
|
||||||
|
-- | In strict mode, Both "MailFrom:" and "From:" fields should have the same value.
|
||||||
|
-- |
|
||||||
|
-- | From RFC7489: For example, if a message passes an SPF check with an
|
||||||
|
-- | RFC5321.MailFrom domain of "cbg.bounces.example.com", and the address
|
||||||
|
-- | portion of the RFC5322.From field contains "payments@example.com",
|
||||||
|
-- | the Authenticated RFC5321.MailFrom domain identifier and the
|
||||||
|
-- | RFC5322.From domain are considered to be "in alignment" in relaxed
|
||||||
|
-- | mode, but not in strict mode.
|
||||||
|
= Strict
|
||||||
|
-- | r = relaxed, default.
|
||||||
|
-- |
|
||||||
|
-- | For DKIM: "From:" field can be in the same domain of the domain of the DKIM signature.
|
||||||
|
-- | Example: "From:" is example@foo.example.org, DKIM signature can be d=example.org or d=bar.example.org.
|
||||||
|
-- |
|
||||||
|
-- | For SPF:
|
||||||
|
| Relaxed
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
data Format = AFRF -- Authentication Failure Reporting Format
|
||||||
|
data Version = DMARC1
|
||||||
|
data Policy
|
||||||
|
-- | "None" means to basically just accept the mail.
|
||||||
|
= None
|
||||||
|
-- | "Quarantine" means to consider the mail as suspicious, by giving it a bad spam score or something like that.
|
||||||
|
| Quarantine
|
||||||
|
-- | "Reject" means to not accept any failure of DKIM or SPF.
|
||||||
|
| Reject
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
type MailTo = String
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user